On Writers
“If I had not existed, someone else would have written me…What is important is Hamlet and A Midsummer Nights Dream, not who wrote them, but that somebody did.” ~ William Faulkner
I have a problem with people calling writing anything other than exactly what it is: a person sitting down (or standing, whatever works) and writing to get an idea out of their head for others to have it. It is not a prayer, it is not a scream, or howl. Whatever torture it puts you through comes of your own self in a way that even the idea did not. The idea came from your life. The need to bleed for it is all you. Whatever asceticism you subject yourself to is of your own doing, and if that is necessary for you to write, so be it. But because you hang yourself on a cross every evening doesn’t mean you and I are saviors. I pay $2.50 for coffee for every thousand words or so. What, then, would you call me? Whether you claw at your hair or pace grooves into your floor or you travel to a mountaintop or you sit quietly in your room, it is your work that makes you what you are. It is not the action that produced the work. The word is all. I have as much respect for Marilynne Robinson as I do for Ernest Hemingway, and I do because they both wrote incredible pieces of literature. To my knowledge, Robinson never served in any army, never drove an ambulance, never hunted or played at hunting U-boats in the Atlantic. These are things that increase my esteem for Hemingway’s life separate from his body of work. I would love The Sun Also Rises whether written by a hero or a coward.
And let’s not inflate what a writer is. They are simply that. Storytellers. A good storyteller is obviously different from a bad storyteller but it’s the story that’s important. You can blow smoke about writers being priests or prophets but everyone has something they can do well and only artists are given to the notion that they are particularly special. When you get your car back from the mechanic and it runs you don’t spend time thinking about the mechanic and what brought him to where he is. You just drive. You ought to think about the writer the same way you do the mechanic. Each performs a service or creates a product and it is the quality of that thing which is important. The only thing the writer ought to have of you is loyalty if he produces a quality product. It’s delusional to ask for more and to think that a writer deserves it. Embrace the work, love the work. When I say I love McCarthy, I mean that I love McCarthy’s work. He’s an interesting guy separate from that, but my interest in him arises primarily from my desire for him to write more books. That’s how it ought to be. It’s bad for the ego for you to think anything else. And despite all of our metaphysical trappings, despite that our occupation itself is a unique one, we aren’t special. We are certainly no more special than nurses or doctors, and certainly less deserving of praise than police officers, firefighters, and soldiers.
What a reader needs to take away from a book does not involve the writer. I won’t delve any deeper in the Barthesian pool than to say that an ideal reading of any book begins with the first page of the text and ends with the last. Any thoughts in between occur in the mind of the reader and nowhere else. Don’t bring a dictionary, a biography, or Wikipedia to the party. Ultimately no writer is going to quit fellating or cunniling-ing themself because I said they aren’t special. It’s the truth, but it’s the reader I’m trying to reach, not the writer. We’re a crazed lot to begin with. But we’re not mystical, we’re not any more in tune with the universe because we put words on a page than anyone else. It’s a unique occupation that’s not a little bit mysterious and more than a little attractive. People like people who live on the edge, and whether it’s the edge of starvation, sanity, or megalomania, the edge is where writers tend to be. But don’t love the writer. Love the book. If it’s good it is the best of the writer; blood, sweat, tears and all other precious bodily fluids distilled whether shed or not, into a story, a message. Don’t ruin all our good work by wondering how dirty we got in the process.
Tune in next time for part 3, the anticlimax that I will call “In Defense of the Writer”. Or some such stickuptheass nonsense. Until then, here’s J. Tillman, telling it like it is.