Butcher’s Crossing: an Argument for Length
I’d been recommended John Williams’ Butcher’s Crossing several months ago, and had heard rumblings of it before then. The biggest selling point for me was that it had been described as an ancestor to McCarthy’s Blood Meridian. I grabbed a copy at Powell’s while I was in Portland and it sat on my shelf until winter break.
Butcher’s Crossing is set in 1870, and centers on Will Andrews’ search for the ineffable and ultimately untameable wildness inherent in the American landscape and in, John Williams’ seems to posit, most Americans. Andrews leaves Harvard to seek this spirit out, coming to Butcher’s Crossing, Kansas. Having a decent amount of money, Andrews gets hooked up with a veteran buffalo hunter named Miller. Miller had, years ago, found an undiscovered valley in Colorado that was almost completely inaccessible, and in which a veritable sea of buffalo live. Now with the buffalo nearly extinct, Miller uses Andrews’ means to assemble a team and the two set out with a skinner and moderately insane ox-driver for the valley he found long ago.
Williams’ book has quite a lot in common with Melville’s Moby-Dick. Andrews is an easy descendant of Ishmael, and Miller is quite clearly Ahab. Miller’s dedication to the hunt, his arrogance and ignorance, ends up trapping the hunters in the valley for the winter. Shy of 300 pages, Butcher’s Crossing is not a particularly big book. Williams spends quite a lot of time with the set up and leaves himself about 200 pages for the execution. The actual hunting and the whopping six months spent in the mountains take up a comparatively little space for being the point of the novel. Where Andrews is supposed to develop, where we’re supposed to be in, dirt-level, with these men, Williams gives us an all too brief glimpse and moves us on. This contrasts strongly against Melville, who, some would argue, throws the reader in too deep.
I argue that the greatest short work of fiction ever told will not match up to the greatest long work. I’m not about to claim titles for those positions, but I’ll say that Butcher’s Crossing and Moby-Dick have similar premises, dissimilar lengths, and dissimilar places in the literary canon. Williams has written a forgettable story because the reader is not submerged in it. Butcher’s Crossing is easily a book of another hundred pages than what was written. The author flies over six crucial months and skims the slaughter of thousands of buffalo. It’s this sort of detail and depth, even repetition, to a degree, that imprint themselves upon a reader’s mind and make the story live on. I had to look up Miller’s name, and I finished the book about two weeks ago.
To bring things full circle, Blood Meridian is not a very big book, but there isn’t a moment in it that’s really skimmed over unnecessarily. McCarthy spends 4 pages introducing us to the Kid and his backstory, throwing us immediately into action and spending the rest of the book in dizzying detail until he again scoops us up through time in a few pages and sets us down at the end. Williams manages the opposite. By cutting through the middle, racing past the changes in these men (and letting Andrews state the changes rather than reveal them) Williams undercuts his ending, which I think would have been excellent had we spent proper time in the events before. The disorientation and frustration the men experience on their return is on the brink of being powerful, but ultimately the reader has been distanced, and the ending falls short.
While Googling, I found out that Joe Penhall, screenwriter for The Road, is actually adapting Butcher’s Crossing into a screenplay. I happened to catch The Road a little over a week ago. Pretty good. I teared up a few times, which is strange for anyone who knows my reaction to the book. Apparently I’ve grown enough to relate in the past few years.
In other news, I read Brian Hart’s debut novel, Then Came the Evening, a little while ago, and am currently powering through Don Carpenter’s Hard Rain Falling, which I am enjoying immensely. I think I’ll try for a true review of the former. Will let you know if that comes out anywhere. Chauffeur won the race by 3000 words, as I got a little too tied up with some craziness over break that I might let you in on sometime. My novel currently stands at over 60k, and I just finished a rewrite of the beginning of the first novel. Great to see how much my characters have matured over time. I think that’s it.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
We need to set up another race sometime.
Honestly, I’m not sure if this will sound dense, but it’s rather difficult for me to separate length as an entity unto itself.
I think that with many writers, the amount of time spent on events, and the economy of language, so to speak, is inherent in their style.
That said, I tend to favor longer pieces, but I don’t necessarily think that the depth of the story determines my predilection for them… I think it’s more a matter of me generally liking epic works as opposed to novels with a more striking tone! If that makes any sense whatsoever!
Really interesting post, in any case. I like.
Holy cats, someone actually read this post.